DICKENS OLDER PEOPLE: TRANSITIONAL NOVEL and MIDDLE NOVELS
The Portrayal of Older Adults in Charles Dickens's Sixth Novel
MARTIN CHUZZLEWIT ( 1842)
An alcoholic nurse, a conniving architect, a"senile" clerk, a wealthy but embittered grandfather, a secret agent, a bony and hard featured Proprietress and a kindly American physician, plus a cast of other primary and supporting characters.
[PART ONE] INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT
In constructing an analysis of both primary and supporting older characters, I am reminded of Keith Selby's comment that, as with any novelist, Dickens "tends to pattern events, characters and settings in such a way that they are opposed with one another thereby dramatising and illustrating the conflicts at the centre of the novel." (1). The contrast between the younger and older character portrayals helps us make sense of Dickens, not just in terms of selfishness as a theme but also in understanding the familial relationships between generations. In addition, Dickens's writing of older adults and how the humanities and literary gerontology guide us to better interpret the subjectness of the lived experience as a process. (2)
Author Jesper Soerensen rightly points out that while the plot of Chuzzlewit goes "in different directions, it is basically a basic drama about testament, inheritance ...it is the characters and their dialogue, together with Dickens's humour and satire, that carry the book" (3). If this is true, as Soerensen suggests, the book lacked planning and coherence; nevertheless, several individual characterizations have become iconic. This does not apply to young Martin Chuzzlewit, the main protagonist, but to several older characters, like Seth Pecksniff, the cousin of old Martin, and thought to be in his fifties or sixties, who, in my mind, is the most villainous. However, Mrs Gamp is believed to be in her fifties, whom Soerensen labels "monstrous", and remains a memorable, humorous, and unforgettable character, as Dickens intended her to be.
So, all memorable and all older adults.
As discussed in a previous blog, if Dickens struggled with his fifth novel, Barnaby Rudge, he also struggled with his sixth. Why? Scholars generally accept Chuzzlewit as a transitional work compared to his early and later books, which are considered in the light of being a young adult rather than in maturity. (4 ) Arguably, Dickens, at thirty, had his hands full in both his personal and professional life ( was it ever thus), what with his driven, complex and often contradictory nature. A passage from Sorensen reflecting on what was going on for Dickens during the thinking and writing of Chuzzlewit captures this brilliantly. I thus fully quote at length the narrative, which reflects the very essence of Dickens. "Father of four, internationally famous, living in a house by Regents Park, London, six years married to Catherine, who he became an invaluable support during his travels in America earlier that year. He maintained his circle of friends, often in an atmosphere of boisterous fun. He was partying and dancing all night; he performed wholeheartedly as a magician in an elaborate costume at his son Charley's birthday party." It was, as Sorensen adds," in many ways, a happy period of his life" but acknowledges that "during the two years of writing Chuzzlewit, it was a time of contrasts.... enjoyed his success, but rather fretted about the future, he lived in a mansion but owed his publishers money, he was in high spirits, but broke into a rage; he wrote masterly a Christmas tale that sold like hot cakes, but yielded a devastatingly low profit; he won a lawsuit, but overwhelmed with legal costs; he spent time raising money for charity, but had to borrow money to pay his own expenses." (5) We could add that Dickens's mental well-being suffered.
The serialization of his novel did not go well. Indeed, it shares the bottom place alongside Barnaby as his worst with readers, then as now. This generalisation, however, might be unfair. Dickens self-championed it to his friend, John Forster, as 'the best of his stories ( as he did all his early novels) but was forced to concede, even lamenting its poor reception and low readership (6) and hence the income he derived from it. The serialization was without doubt ' lacking a coherent plot and a mess.' (7) This is not the place to debate the numerous subjective evaluations and the repurposing, re-engineering or re-contextualizing of this transionary novel. (8) In today's parlance, it had and still has mixed 'reviews.'
Mrs Gamp makes Tea. Illustration by Hablot Browne
The American 'Diversion'
Illustration by Phiz- Hablot Knight
Browne. (1842 edition)
When Dickens had completed the serialization of Chuzzlewit (mid-June 1844), he had had enough and left for a year-long sabbatical to Italy with his family. Additionally, he took away the knowledge that the characters of a story 'triumphed over structure.' The plot of Chuzzlewit was indeed weak; however, as Goldie Morgentaler writes, it was a " demonstration of how great a writer can overcome the limitations of a weak plot by infusing his characters with so much life that the weaknesses of the plot are secondary" (13). Young Martin could be viewed as a highly forgettable character whom Morgentaler describes as eponymous but cites Seth Pecksniff and Sarha Gamp being both "inspired examples of the comedic imagination at work."(14) It is noteworthy that both were older adults alongside twenty-three others characterized in the book. Nobody reading Chuzzlewit can fail to forget them, and they are considered representative of type but also of Victorian cant and values. The themes related to age and ageing are seen in his early novels. Old Martin, Selby posits, is "a mirror image of young Martin: both start selfish, both go through a learning process, and both have lost their selfishness by the end of the novel", and here comes Selby's most relevant point in our discussion, namely "....the theme of selfishness is repeated in both young and old Martin, this suggests that Dickens is talking about the recurrence of human failings and weaknesses. This idea is supported by the new country that Martin is swindled: there is no clear divide between young and old whereby new is wholly good and the old wholly bad, or visa versa" (15)
Whilst Chuzzlewit is about family and its dynamics, Dickens constantly continues this theme and will do so in his next novel, Dombey and Son (1846). The intersections between young and old and drawing upon his own intra-family relationships are constant. The repentant or enlightened older adult sees the error of their ways, leading to either restitution and wellbeing, death or suicide. Dickens also highlights intersections between wealth and poverty, gender, old age, societal injustice and the accruing or securing of inheritances. We cannot ignore or marginalize the older supporting characters, their role and social standing, power and control; Dickens certainly didn't.
Was the thirty-year-old Dickens a Radical and/or Reformer? The highly influential Dickensian scholar Emeritus Professor Jenny Hartley says his "own 'visionary dialogues', his extravagant conceits and metaphysical yokings together the totally disparate, his willful category confusions of animate and inanimate, wordplay; for him, it is ultimately the carnival of language itself which will defy the 'grim realities' and the iron binding of the mind' he saw all around him." (16)
Overthinking Dickens's intentions and mindset concerning his characterizations of older characters is dangerous territory. Scholars, even amateur commentators such as myself, can read something that does not exist in them. Like most of his novels, he was more preoccupied with being a literary comic performer and entertainer (17). Martin Chizzelwit and its' cast of older adults are no different. But Selby also highlights that concerning Pecksniff, Dickens exposes the selfishness and hypocrisy that existed generally through the character. The character of old Martin Chizzlewit demonstrates irascibility, jealousy, suspiciousness and rigidity, but he is no fool and gets the measure of Pecksniff. Could it be, rather than Dickens stereotyping old age and older people, he was, in fact, portraying a patriarch protecting the interests and financial security of family members and at the same time confronting their ( and his own) selfishness and greed? Was Dickens challenging the obsession with wealth accumulation in a very materialistic lower/middle-class section of society?
Before getting carried away with Old Martin's 'altruism', we are reminded that he raised his grandson, who became a selfish, self-centred, uncaring young man. This influence on young Martin's character cannot be ignored—' like father, like son'. The reformation of young Martin was his experience in America, where he realised that he was selfish and committed himself to change. Old Martin sees the 'new' grandson on his return. He becomes cupid, ensuring that the relationship between Mary Graham, his 17-year-old companion and young Martin is encouraged, culminating in a happy-ever-after ending. Pecksniff's gratuitous behaviour in attempting to bully Mary into marrying him is, in fact, thwarted by Old Martin. As an aside, and not surprisingly, Dickens portrays Mary as 'timid and yet self-controlled, she was short, slight and charming.'(18)
Old Martin and Mary - illustration by Sol Eytinge Jr. Victorian Webb
'Happy Families' and their Fortunes
I unsuccessfully searched for an illustrated Chuzzlewit family tree to better show its genealogy and thus clarify its complicated intergenerational relationships. However, I did come across Catherine Waters's Fractured Families in the Early Novels, where she draws upon "feminist and new historical methodologies focussed upon the normalizing function of middle-class domestic ideology", showing how Dickens's early novels "record a shift in notions of the family away from earlier stress on the importance of lineage and blood towards a new ideal of domesticity assumed to be the natural form of the family." (19) Pointing out that reclaiming birthrights is very much part of the early novels, Waters references the original title when it was serialized whereby Dickens sought to demonstrate those of the Chuzzlewit clan "came from silver spoons, and who from wooden ladles" illustrating the introductory "satirical chapter 'Concerning the Pedigree of the Chuzzlwit Family serv(ing) to establish the Paradise Lost motif that pervades the novel, as it traces the dubious genealogy of the Chuzzlewits who undoubtedly descended from Adam and Eve" (20)(21). Don't we all.
While Dickens was already a successful novelist, we have already noted that he was not particularly wealthy (unless we consider the level of Victorian poverty). Inheritance would become vital to him, but already at thirty, he was aware of 'poor moral inheritance, which he reflected in Chuzzlewit.' (22) In passing, the protection of inheritance and its exploitation remain with us even today (23)
In seeking to protect the family's inheritance and expose their greed and manipulation, Old Martin adopts the persona of a frail and mentally incapacitated older adult. Professor Jacob Jewusiak demonstrates how Old Martin's failed physical and mental capacity and decrepit old age drive the novel's plot. It is, he says, "a tacit belief that the inevitable progression towards the end of life is one marked by decay and debilitation." - old age and decay allowed Old Martin to take control. (24) Arguably, the fractured Chuzzlewit family, their greed and selfishness were born out of Old Martin's wealth, his desire to be regarded as the patrician and, above all, to be in control. His ruse, as Jewusiak says," by which Old Martin can set his grandson free from the influence of Pecksniff, do penance for his own pride, and punish Peckniff in the process." (25) The expectation, or even entitlement to an inheritance—whether cash or property—remains a motivator, particularly in fractured families and broken intrafamily relationships. Nothing changes.
How did older adults as wealthholders control their power and authority in the structured class demarcations of late Georgian and early/mid-Victorian society? Jewusiak again: "The promise of inheritance and power of money are widely acknowledged as the best way to ensure independence and respect for elderly people who might otherwise be pushed to the margins". He quotes Cole and Edwards, Pat Thane and Helen Small, and I could do no better than likewise draw on their insights: "The elderly's bargaining power over the bequests of land, tools, and other economic assets, as well as trade skills, will safeguard their comforts until death." (26)(27)(28)
The somewhat convoluted and long-drawn-out plot and subplots present for many readers a narrative maze, which, interestingly, includes the portrayal of several older characters, such as Chuffey, Nadgett, Anthony, Gamp, possibly George, and Mrs Ned Chuzzlewit. Happy Families, indeed.
PART TWO:
I reflect in more detail Dickens's portrayals of these older characters, both major and minor, and how we might interpret the subjective experience of Victorian ageing as a lived experience
Sources, Notes and References
1. SELBY. K ' How to Study a Charles Dickens Novel'. How to Study Literature Series. General Editors: John Peck & Martin Coyle. Introduction. Macmillan. (1989) (p2)
2. JOHNSON. J (Ed) 'Writing Old Age'. The Open University & Centre for Policy & Ageing. Nos 3. The Representation of Older People in Ageing Research Series. Introduction (2004) (p1)
3. SOERENSEN. J. 'Charles Dickens; The Stories of His Life' Chapter Six: Martin Chuzzzlewit. Olympia Publishers. (2023) (p115)
4. SCHLICKE. P. (General Editor); The Aniversary Edition 'The Oxford Companion to Charles Dickens' Martin Chuzzlewit (2011) (p 373)
5. Ibid. (SOERENSEN) (p116-117)
6. BROWNING. L.G. 'Martin Chuzzlewit'. Chapter Eleven. In PATTEN.R, JORDAN.J, WATERS (Eds). The Oxford Handbook of Charles Dickens. Oxford University Press (2018) (p 166-167)
7. BOWDEN. J. 'Other Dickens: Pickwick to Chuzzlewit':Oxford (OUP). Ibid BROWNING.(p 167)
8. Ibid. BROWNING .L. (p178)
9. Ibid SCHLICKE. P. Sub Title: Contract, Text and Publishing History of Martin Chuzzlewit. (p 375)
10. Ibid. SCHLICKE. P. ( p374)
11. Ibid. (p376)
12. Ibid (p376)
13. MORGENTALER. G. In Chapter 24, Martin Chuzzlewit. PAROISSIEN. D. (ed) ' A Companion to Charles Dickens' Wiley-Blackwell. (2007) (p 348)
14. Ibid (p 348)
15. Ibid SELBY. K. (p 82)
16. HARTLEY, J. ' Charles Dickens- An Introduction Chapter Five. Oxford University Press (2016) (p 112)
17. Ibid. SELBY.K ( p 84)
18. HAWES. D. 'Who's Who in Dickens' Routledge. London and New York (2002 ed) (p. 95).
19. Taken from the Blurb Backpiece: WATERS, C. 'Dickens and the Politics of the Family' Cambridge University Press. (1997)
20. Ibid. WATERS, C.(p39)
21. BEER, G. 'Darwins Plots' London ARK Paperbacks. Quoted in WATERS.C (1985) (p 128)
22. Ibid. WATERS C. (p 39)
23. THE CARE ACT: England ( 2014. Implemented 2015).> "Safeguarding, which specifically addressed financial or material abuse.
24. JEWUSIAK. J. 'Ageing, Duration, and the English Novel; Growing Old from Dickens to Wolf'. Chapter 2. 'No Plots for Old Men'. Cambridge University Press. (2020) (p 58-59)
25. Ibid. JEWUSIAK.J (p57-58)